Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ntsabane, T.
dc.date.accessioned 2011-10-17T10:01:33Z
dc.date.available 2011-10-17T10:01:33Z
dc.date.issued 2003
dc.identifier.citation Ntsabane, T. (2003) A comparative analysis of two labour reserves in early 20th century Southern Africa, Pula: Botswana Journal of African Studies, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp.105-114 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10311/893
dc.description.abstract Southern Africa has through much of its 20th century history been characterised by a centre~periphery regional economic system. At the centre has been South Africa(minus its African reserves) and the rest of the region the periphery. Key has been the migrant labour system whereby the centre has been able to extract cheap labour from its periphery. The cheapness, however, is disputed by among others Burawoy (1976). The labour- supplying periphery was actually composed of two tiers. On the one hand were the African Reserves, comprising the Transkei, Ciskei, Bophuthatswana, etc., politically a part of South Africa. On the other hand were the independent states of Botswana, Lesotho, Swaziland, Malawi, Mozambique and Zimbabwe en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Pula: Botswana Journal of African Studies en_US
dc.subject Labour en_US
dc.subject Reserves en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Migrant labour--Africa, Southern en_US
dc.title A comparative analysis of two labour reserves in early 20th century Southern Africa en_US
dc.type Published Article en_US
dc.link http://archive.lib.msu.edu/DMC/African%20Journals/pdfs/PULA/pula017002/pula017002014.pdf en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UBRISA


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account