Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Weiser, S.D.
dc.contributor.author Heisler, M.
dc.contributor.author Leiter, K.
dc.contributor.author Percy-de Korte, F.
dc.contributor.author Tlou, S.
dc.contributor.author DeMonner, S.
dc.contributor.author Phaladze, N.
dc.contributor.author Bangsberg, D.R.
dc.contributor.author Iacopino, V.
dc.date.accessioned 2010-07-13T13:58:14Z
dc.date.available 2010-07-13T13:58:14Z
dc.date.issued 2006
dc.identifier.citation Weiser, S.D. et al (2006) Routine HIV testing in Botswana: a population-based study on attitudes, practices, and human rights concerns, PLoS Medicine, Vol. 3, No. 7, pp. 1013-1022 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1549-1676 (electronic)
dc.identifier.issn 1549-1277 (print)
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10311/554
dc.description.abstract Background The Botswana government recently implemented a policy of routine or "opt-out" HIV testing in response to the high prevalence of HIV infection, estimated at 37% of adults. Methods and Findings We conducted a cross-sectional, population-based study of 1,268 adults from five districts in Botswana to assess knowledge of and attitudes toward routine testing, correlates of HIV testing, and barriers and facilitators to testing, 11 months after the introduction of this policy. Most participants (81%) reported being extremely or very much in favor of routine testing. The majority believed that this policy would decrease barriers to testing (89%), HIV-related stigma (60%), and violence toward women (55%), and would increase access to antiretroviral treatment (93%). At the same time, 43% of participants believed that routine testing would lead people to avoid going to the doctor for fear of testing, and 14% believed that this policy could increase gender-based violence related to testing. The prevalence of self-reported HIV testing was 48%. Adjusted correlates of testing included female gender (AOR ¼ 1.5, 95% CI ¼ 1.1–1.9), higher education (AOR¼2.0, 95% CI¼1.5–2.7), more frequent healthcare visits (AOR¼ 1.9, 95% CI ¼ 1.3–2.7), perceived access to HIV testing (AOR ¼ 1.6, 95% CI ¼ 1.1–2.5), and inconsistent condom use (AOR ¼ 1.6, 95% CI ¼ 1.2–2.1). Individuals with stigmatizing attitudes toward people living with HIV and AIDS were less likely to have been tested for HIV/AIDS (AOR ¼ 0.7, 95% CI ¼ 0.5–0.9) or to have heard of routine testing (AOR ¼ 0.59, 95% CI ¼ 0.45–0.76). While experiences with voluntary and routine testing overall were positive, 68% felt that they could not refuse the HIV test. Key barriers to testing included fear of learning one’s status (49%), lack of perceived HIV risk (43%), and fear of having to change sexual practices with a positive HIV test (33%). Conclusions Routine testing appears to be widely supported and may reduce barriers to testing in Botswana. As routine testing is adopted elsewhere, measures should be implemented to assure true informed consent and human rights safeguards, including protection from HIV-related discrimination and protection of women against partner violence related to testing. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher PLoS Medicine. www.plosmedicine.org en_US
dc.subject Voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) en_US
dc.subject Routine testing en_US
dc.subject HIV routine testing en_US
dc.subject Human rights concerns en_US
dc.title Routine HIV testing in Botswana: a population-based study on attitudes, practices, and human rights concerns en_US
dc.type Published Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UBRISA


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account