Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Jourdan, F.
dc.contributor.author Fe´raud, G.
dc.contributor.author Bertrand, H.
dc.contributor.author Kampunzu, A.B.
dc.contributor.author Tshoso, G.
dc.contributor.author Le Gall, B.
dc.contributor.author Tiercelin, J.-J.
dc.contributor.author Capiez, P.
dc.date.accessioned 2009-10-06T13:38:27Z
dc.date.available 2009-10-06T13:38:27Z
dc.date.issued 2004
dc.identifier.citation Jourdan, F. et al (2004) The Karoo triple junction questioned: evidence from Jurassic and Proterozoic 40Ar/39Ar ages and geochemistry of the giant Okavango dyke swarm (Botswana), Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Vol. 222, pp. 989–1006 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0012-821X
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10311/383
dc.description.abstract The lower Jurassic Karoo–Ferrar magmatism represents one of the most important Phanerozoic continental flood basalt (CFB) provinces. The Karoo CFB province is dominated by tholeiitic traps and apparently radiating giant dyke swarms covering altogether ca. 3 106 km2. This study focuses on the giant N110j-trending Okavango dyke swarm (ODS) stretching over 1500 km across Botswana. This dyke swarm represents the main (failed) arm of the so-called Karoo triple junction that is generally considered as a key marker of the impingement of the Karoo starting mantle plume head. ODS dolerites yield six new plagioclase 40Ar/39Ar plateau (and miniplateau) ages ranging from 178.7F0.7 and 180.9F1.3 Ma. The distribution of the ages along a narrow Gaussian curve suggests a short period of magmatic activity centered around 179 Ma, i.e., f5 Ma younger than the emplacement age of Karoo mafic magmas in the southern part of the Karoo CFB province (f184). This age difference indicates that Karoo magmatism does not represent a short-lived event as is generally the case for most CFB but lasted at least 5Ma over the whole province. In addition, small clusters of plagioclase separated from 28 other dykes and measured by ‘‘speedy’’ step-heating experiments (with mostly two to three steps), gave either ‘‘Karoo’’ or Proterozoic ages. Integrated ages of the Proterozoic rocks range from 851F6 to 1672F7 Ma, and one plateau age (959.1F4.6 Ma) and one possibly geologically significant weightedmean age (982.7F4.0 Ma) were obtained. Proterozoic and Karoo mafic rocks are petrographically similar, but Proterozoic dykes display clear geochemical differences (e.g., TiO2 < 2.1%) with the Karoo high-Ti ODS (TiO2>2.1%). Geochemical data combined with available Ar/Ar dates allow the identification of the two groups within a total set of 77 dykes investigated: f10% of the bulk ODS dykes are Proterozoic. Thus, the Jurassic Karoo ODS dykes were emplaced along reactivated Proterozoic structures and there is no pristine Jurassic Nuanetsi triple junction as commonly proposed. This throws into doubt the validity of the ‘‘active plume head’’ Karoo CFB rift models as being responsible for the observed ‘‘triple junction’’ dyke geometry en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Elservier www.elsevier.com/locate/epsl en_US
dc.subject 40Ar/39Ar dating en_US
dc.subject Geochemical discrimination en_US
dc.subject Dyke swarm en_US
dc.subject Triple junction en_US
dc.subject Karoo en_US
dc.subject Mantle plume en_US
dc.title The Karoo triple junction questioned: evidence from Jurassic and Proterozoic 40Ar/39Ar ages and geochemistry of the giant Okavango dyke swarm (Botswana) en_US
dc.type Published Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UBRISA


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account